Real Analysis, Real Learning, Real Results

We started TechSmartBridge because most financial education felt disconnected from what actually matters. Too much theory, not enough practical analysis. Too many shortcuts, not enough depth.

Since 2019, we've focused on one thing — teaching fundamental analysis the way professionals approach it. Not get-rich-quick schemes. Not trading tricks. Just solid research methods that help you understand what companies are actually worth.

We teach in Sofia's financial district because we believe learning works best when it's hands-on, collaborative, and grounded in real-world examples.

Financial analysis workspace with research materials
Students working on financial models
Financial statement analysis session

Why We Started This

Back in 2018, I was consulting for a firm in Sofia that wanted to train their junior analysts. The materials available were either too academic or way too simplified. Nothing bridged that gap between theory and actual work.

So I built the course myself. Started with six people around a conference table. We went through real company reports, dissected balance sheets, debated valuation methods. It wasn't polished, but it worked.

By 2019, word spread and we formalized it. Elena joined to handle coordination — she had been teaching financial modeling at a university and was frustrated with the same gaps I'd seen. Together, we've refined the approach based on what students actually struggle with.

  • We focus on Bulgarian and European markets because that's what matters to our students
  • Classes stay small so everyone gets direct feedback on their analysis
  • We update materials constantly because markets change and methods improve

Who You'll Learn From

Small team. Big experience. We've both worked as analysts, dealt with bad data, made mistakes, and learned what actually works in practice.

Desislav Rangelov teaching financial analysis

Desislav Rangelov

Director & Senior Analyst

Spent twelve years analyzing European equities before moving into education. I still consult on valuation projects, which keeps my methods current. My teaching style is direct — I'd rather you understand one concept deeply than memorize ten formulas.

Elena Dimitrova reviewing financial models

Elena Dimitrova

Education Coordinator

Background in both teaching and buy-side analysis. I design our curriculum and make sure it flows logically — no jumping around between disconnected topics. I also run our weekend workshops on specific analysis techniques.

Interactive learning session at TechSmartBridge

What Drives Our Approach

These aren't aspirational values printed on a poster. They're the practical principles that shape how we design courses and interact with students.

Depth Over Breadth

We'd rather you master DCF modeling thoroughly than skim through ten different valuation methods. Deep understanding lets you adapt when situations change.

Practice With Real Data

Every exercise uses actual company reports, messy footnotes and all. You learn to deal with incomplete information and make reasoned judgments.

Honest Limitations

We talk about what fundamental analysis can't do. It won't predict next quarter's stock price. It won't guarantee returns. But it will help you think more clearly about business value.

Continuous Refinement

Elena and I review every session. What confused people? Where did discussions get stuck? We adjust materials based on that feedback, not based on what looks impressive in a syllabus.

Financial analysis methodology workshop

Want to See How We Teach?

Our next program starts September 2025. We keep groups around eight people so there's room for actual discussion. If you're curious about the approach, check out the full program details or just send us a question.